Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression Analysis of Adversity Scores (Disengaged and Controlling Environment) and Group Status on Facial Emotion Recognition (FER) (n = 85)

From: Adversity, attachment and emotion recognition in BPD adolescents: the distinct roles of disengaged and controlling environment

 

β

t

p

R2

Accuracy

Group

− .02

− .93

.355

0.268

Disengaged environment

.01

1.17

.247

 

Controlling environment

− .02

− 2.57

.013

 

Accuracy

Group

.07

1.79

.078

0.358

Disengaged environment

.02

1.50

.140

 

Controlling environment

− .01

− .60

.548

 

Group x Disengaged environment

− .02

− 1.36

.180

 

Group x Controlling environment

− .04

− 2.25

.028

 

Sensitivity

Group

− 3.28

− 2.00

.050

0.209

Disengaged environment

.10

.19

.853

 

Controlling environment

.12

.20

.846

 

Sensitivity

Group

− 8.93

− 3.42

.001

0.374

Disengaged environment

− 2.49

− 2.98

.004

 

Controlling environment

.92

1.19

.240

 

Group x Disengaged environment

4.25

3.98

< .001

 

Group x Controlling environment

− .66

− .60

.552

 
  1. All models controlled by age, sex, CSP
  2. Bold indicates threshold is significant, i.e. < 0.05