Table 4 Post-hoc tests and Interaction effects of gender-client therapist matching in terms of QoL and Symptom reduction in CBT
From: Client-therapist dyads and therapy outcome: Does sex matching matters? A cross-sectional study
| Â | Post-hoc-tests | Interaction effect ANOVA | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender therapist | Gender client | p | η2 | Gender client | Gender therapist | p | η2 | F(df) | p | η2 (CI: 90%) | ||
QoL | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Male | Male (1.98 ± .98) | Female (1.92 ± .99) | .603 | .000 | Male | Male (1.98 ± .08) | Female (1.92 ± .07) | .324 | .002 | F(1, 559) = 1.22 | .270 | .002 (0; .008) |
Female | Male (2.11 ± .93) | Female (1.87 ± .80) | .047 | .007 | Female | Male (2.11 ± .10) | Female (1.87 ± .05) | .609 | .000 |  |  |  |
Symptom reduction | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Male | Male (2.05 ± 1.13) | Female (2.00 ± 1.00) | .865 | .000 | Male | Male (2.05 ± 1.13) | Female (2.00 ± 1.00) | .935 | .000 | F(df) | p | η2 (CI: 90%) |
Female | Male (2.07 ± .91) | Female (1.72 ± .76) | .224 | .014 | Female | Male (2.07 ± .91) | Female (1.72 ± .76) | .225 | .014 | F(1, 102) = .605 | .438 | .006 (0; .053) |