Skip to main content

Table 2 Goodness-of-fit indices for the estimated models

From: Reconsidering the structure of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being using wide age-range Japanese adult sample: An exploratory analysis

Group Factors Parameters χ2 DF p Log-likelihood TLI AIC AICC BIC aBIC RMSEA 90%CI SRMR Eigen values Cumulative variance (%) Parallel analysis
[Lower, Upper]
10s to 20s 1 63 982.783 189 < .001 − 9955.233 0.659 20,036.467 20,064.762 20,279.336 20,079.479 .110 [.103, .117] .100 6.389 30.424  
2 83 492.496 169 < .001 − 9710.090 0.845 19,586.180 19,638.799 19,906.151 19,642.847 .074 [.067, .082] .057 2.597 42.790  
3 102 259.483 150 < .001 − 9593.583 0.941 19,391.167 19,476.582 19,784.384 19,460.806 .046 [.036, .055] .034 1.670 50.741  
4 120 187.208 132 .001 − 9557.446 0.966 19,354.892 19,482.260 19,817.500 19,436.819 .035 [.022, .046] .025 1.232 56.606 ✓
5 137 148.486 115 .019 − 9538.085 0.976 19,350.170 19,529.374 19,878.315 19,443.704 .029 [.012, .041] .022 0.870 60.750  
6 153 118.051 99 .093 − 9522.867 0.984 19,351.735 19,593.397 19,941.561 19,456.193 .023 [.000, .038] .019 0.804 64.580  
30s to 40s 1 63 1080.100 189 < .001 − 10,442.523 0.654 21,011.046 21,036.012 21,260.426 21,060.534 .110 [.104, .117] .104 6.278 29.897  
2 83 537.562 169 < .001 − 10,171.254 0.840 20,508.508 20,554.528 20,837.057 20,573.707 .075 [.068, .082] .060 2.676 42.639  
3 102 280.285 150 < .001 − 10,042.615 0.936 20,289.231 20,363.217 20,692.990 20,369.354 .047 [.039, .056] .033 1.761 51.027  
4 120 187.275 132 .001 − 9996.110 0.969 20,232.220 20,341.393 20,707.231 20,326.483 .033 [.021, .043] .024 1.133 56.423  
5 137 138.828 115 .065 − 9971.887 0.985 20,217.774 20,369.629 20,760.078 20,325.391 .023 [.000, .036] .020 0.976 61.070 ✓
6 153 90.856 99 .708 − 9947.901 1.006 20,201.802 20,404.051 20,807.441 20,321.987 .000 [.000, .021] .016 0.797 64.865  
50s to 60s 1 63 892.974 189 < .001 − 10,127.432 0.710 20,380.864 20,405.676 20,630.569 20,430.675 .098 [.091, .104] .086 6.409 30.520  
2 83 506.902 169 < .001 − 9934.396 0.844 20,034.792 20,080.510 20,363.769 20,100.416 .072 [.065, .079] .056 2.125 40.640  
3 102 294.227 150 < .001 − 9828.058 0.925 19,860.117 19,933.586 20,264.402 19,940.763 .050 [.041, .058] .034 1.843 49.414  
4 120 233.434 132 < .001 − 9797.662 0.940 19,835.324 19,943.682 20,310.953 19,930.202 .044 [.035, .054] .029 1.142 54.853 ✓
5 137 171.361 115 < .001 − 9766.625 0.962 19,807.251 19,957.896 20,350.261 19,915.570 .035 [.024, .046] .024 0.939 59.323  
6 153 122.342 99 .056 − 9742.116 0.982 19,790.232 19,990.760 20,396.660 19,911.202 .025 [.000, .038] .019 0.867 63.450  
  1. Bold indicates the most fitted model, and italic indicates the second fitted model
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us