Skip to main content

Table 2 Goodness-of-fit indices for the estimated models

From: Reconsidering the structure of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being using wide age-range Japanese adult sample: An exploratory analysis

Group

Factors

Parameters

χ2

DF

p

Log-likelihood

TLI

AIC

AICC

BIC

aBIC

RMSEA

90%CI

SRMR

Eigen values

Cumulative variance (%)

Parallel analysis

[Lower, Upper]

10s to 20s

1

63

982.783

189

< .001

− 9955.233

0.659

20,036.467

20,064.762

20,279.336

20,079.479

.110

[.103, .117]

.100

6.389

30.424

 

2

83

492.496

169

< .001

− 9710.090

0.845

19,586.180

19,638.799

19,906.151

19,642.847

.074

[.067, .082]

.057

2.597

42.790

 

3

102

259.483

150

< .001

− 9593.583

0.941

19,391.167

19,476.582

19,784.384

19,460.806

.046

[.036, .055]

.034

1.670

50.741

 

4

120

187.208

132

.001

− 9557.446

0.966

19,354.892

19,482.260

19,817.500

19,436.819

.035

[.022, .046]

.025

1.232

56.606

✓

5

137

148.486

115

.019

− 9538.085

0.976

19,350.170

19,529.374

19,878.315

19,443.704

.029

[.012, .041]

.022

0.870

60.750

 

6

153

118.051

99

.093

− 9522.867

0.984

19,351.735

19,593.397

19,941.561

19,456.193

.023

[.000, .038]

.019

0.804

64.580

 

30s to 40s

1

63

1080.100

189

< .001

− 10,442.523

0.654

21,011.046

21,036.012

21,260.426

21,060.534

.110

[.104, .117]

.104

6.278

29.897

 

2

83

537.562

169

< .001

− 10,171.254

0.840

20,508.508

20,554.528

20,837.057

20,573.707

.075

[.068, .082]

.060

2.676

42.639

 

3

102

280.285

150

< .001

− 10,042.615

0.936

20,289.231

20,363.217

20,692.990

20,369.354

.047

[.039, .056]

.033

1.761

51.027

 

4

120

187.275

132

.001

− 9996.110

0.969

20,232.220

20,341.393

20,707.231

20,326.483

.033

[.021, .043]

.024

1.133

56.423

 

5

137

138.828

115

.065

− 9971.887

0.985

20,217.774

20,369.629

20,760.078

20,325.391

.023

[.000, .036]

.020

0.976

61.070

✓

6

153

90.856

99

.708

− 9947.901

1.006

20,201.802

20,404.051

20,807.441

20,321.987

.000

[.000, .021]

.016

0.797

64.865

 

50s to 60s

1

63

892.974

189

< .001

− 10,127.432

0.710

20,380.864

20,405.676

20,630.569

20,430.675

.098

[.091, .104]

.086

6.409

30.520

 

2

83

506.902

169

< .001

− 9934.396

0.844

20,034.792

20,080.510

20,363.769

20,100.416

.072

[.065, .079]

.056

2.125

40.640

 

3

102

294.227

150

< .001

− 9828.058

0.925

19,860.117

19,933.586

20,264.402

19,940.763

.050

[.041, .058]

.034

1.843

49.414

 

4

120

233.434

132

< .001

− 9797.662

0.940

19,835.324

19,943.682

20,310.953

19,930.202

.044

[.035, .054]

.029

1.142

54.853

✓

5

137

171.361

115

< .001

− 9766.625

0.962

19,807.251

19,957.896

20,350.261

19,915.570

.035

[.024, .046]

.024

0.939

59.323

 

6

153

122.342

99

.056

− 9742.116

0.982

19,790.232

19,990.760

20,396.660

19,911.202

.025

[.000, .038]

.019

0.867

63.450

 
  1. Bold indicates the most fitted model, and italic indicates the second fitted model
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us