Skip to main content

Table 2 Twin-to-singleton ORs in the different levels of the categorial moderator variables within the non-right-handedness (NRH) comparison. Overall, 20 studies were included in the NRH comparison (see main text).

From: Handedness in twins: meta-analyses

Variable

Levels

Studies (k)

Participants (n)

Twins

Singletons

twin-to-singleton NRH OR [95% CI]

Sicotte et al. [10] meta-analysis

Yes (included in Sicotte et al. [10])

13

85,371

8281

77,090

1.43 [1.23, 1.66]

 

No (new study)

6

38,394

30,773

7621

1.26 [1.01, 1.57]

Ancestry

Europe/USA/Australia

16

101,828

38,090

63,738

1.40 [1.23, 1.59]

 

East Asia

3

21,937

964

20,973

1.16 [0.79, 1.72]

Study purpose

Handedness in twins

17

187,645

49,375

138,270

1.38 [1.23, 1.54]

 

Other purpose

3

1629

691

938

1.21 [0.85, 1.74]

Type of singleton group

Genetically related to the twins

4

77,763

15,614

62,149

1.31 [1.07, 1.60]

 

Genetically unrelated to the twins

12

103,122

33,799

69,323

1.41 [1.22, 1.63]

Handedness classification

R-A-L

4

38,975

26,511

12,464

1.12 [0.87, 1.45]

 

R-L

12

83,177

11,852

71,325

1.45 [1.26, 1.68]

Method of handedness assessment

Preference obtained from inventories containing more than one item

5

16,721

1560

15,161

1.57 [1.26, 1.95]

 

Self-reports/writing hand

12

170,689

47,700

122,989

1.32 [1.19, 1.47]

  1. In cases where numbers do not add up to 20, some of the studies did not include information on the moderator variable