Skip to main content

Table 3 Rated priority of six evidence-based interventions

From: Prioritising interventions for preventing mental health problems for children experiencing adversity: a modified nominal group technique Australian consensus study

 

n

Interventions

 

Stakeholder type

 

Parenting programs

School-based anti-bullying programs

Psychological therapy for children exposed to trauma

Community-wide programs

Nurse home visiting programs

Economic and social programs

Total across interventions

Service providers

 

% high or very high priority (n)

 

Health

3

100 (3)

66.7 (2)

33.3 (1)

100 (3)

100 (3)

33.3 (1)

72.2 (2)^

Child and family

3

100 (3)

33.3 (1)

66.7 (2)

33.3 (1)

100 (3)

66.7 (2)

66.7 (2)

Social sector

2

100 (2)

50.00 (1)

100 (2)

100 (2)

100 (2)

100 (2)

91.7 (2) ^

Early education and disability inclusion

7

71.4 (5)

71.4 (5)

85.7 (6)

100 (2)

85.7 (6)

85.7 (6)

83.3 (6) ^

Drug and alcohol

2

100 (2)

50.00 (1)

100 (2)

100 (2)

100 (2)

100 (2)

91.7 (2) ^

Caregivers

2

100 (2)

100 (2)

50 (1)

50 (1)

100 (2)

50 (1)

75 (2) ^

Overall

19

89.5* (17)

63.2 (12)

73.7 (14)

84.2* (16)

94.7* (18)

73.7 (14)

79.8 (15) ^

  1. *Consensus reached when interventions were rated as high or very high priority by 75% or moreparticipants
  2. ^Rounded to the nearest whole number of participants