Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjusted logistic regression analyses between the continuous GMSI scores and the dichotomized workability score (WAS; n = 2219)

From: Supportive and demanding managerial circumstances and associations with excellent workability: a cross-sectional study of Swedish school principals

Independent variables

Model 1 partially adjusted1

Model 2 partially adjusted2

Model 3 partially adjusted3

Model 4 fully adjusted4

(OR increase with 95% CI, WAS Poor to good vs. Excellent)

(OR increase with 95% CI, WAS Poor to good vs. Excellent)

(OR increase with 95% CI, WAS Poor to good vs. Excellent)

(OR increase with 95% CI, WAS Poor to good vs. Excellent)

OR

95% CI

P value

OR

95% CI

P value

OR

95% CI

P value

OR

95% CI

P value

GMSI Demanding circumstances, effect per unit increase in mean score (1–5)

Resource deficits

1.11

0.98–1.25

.096

1.10

0.98–1.25

.115

1.12

0.99–1.26

.085

1.11

0.98–1.26

.108

Organisational control

0.90

0.78–1.05

.177

0.90

0.78–1.05

.187

0.89

0.76–1.03

.122

0.89

0.76–1.04

.132

Role conflicts

0.76

0.65–0.88

 < .001

0.76

0.65–0.88

 < .001

0.77

0.66–0.90

.001

0.75

0.64–0.88

 < 0.001

Role demands

0.70

0.59–0.83

 < .001

0.69

0.58–0.82

 < .001

0.69

0.58–0.82

 < .001

0.73

0.62–0.87

 < 0.001

Group dynamics

0.86

0.72–1.02

.083

0.87

0.73–1.03

.107

0.86

0.72–1.03

.105

0.90

0.75–1.07

.222

Buffer-function

0.89

0.77–1.03

.119

0.91

0.78–1.05

.190

0.91

0.79–1.06

.226

0.92

0.80–1.07

.283

Co-workers

1.13

0.96–1.33

.156

1.13

0.96–1.33

.153

1.14

0.96–1.34

.137

1.09

0.92–1.29

.305

Container-function

0.87

0.75–1.01

.064

0.85

0.73–0.99

.034

0.86

0.74–1.00

.051

0.86

0.74–1.01

.057

GMSI Supportive circumstances, effect per unit increase in mean score (1–5)

Supportive management

0.99

0.89–1.11

.904

1.00

0.89–1.11

.960

1.00

0.89–1.11

.924

1.00

0.90–1.12

.991

Cooperating co-workers

1.05

0.88–1.27

.576

1.04

0.86–1.25

.714

1.03

0.86–1.25

.732

1.01

0.84–1.22

.895

Supportive colleagues

1.13

1.02–1.25

.018

1.13

1.02–1.26

.017

1.12

1.01–1.25

.030

1.13

1.01–1.25

.027

Supportive private life

1.32

1.19–1.47

 < .001

1.32

1.19–1.48

 < .001

1.23

1.10–1.38

 < .001

1.23

1.10–1.37

 < .001

Supportive org. structures

1.25

1.09–1.42

.001

1.26

1.10–1.43

.001

1.25

1.10–1.43

.001

1.22

1.06–1.39

.004

Length of work experience as a principal

1–3 years of experience

1.47

1.08–2.00

.014

1.46

1.08–1.99

.015

1.43

1.05–1.94

.024

1.42

1.04–1.94

.028

 > 3–5 years of experience

1.18

0.88–1.58

.272

1.18

0.88–1.59

.263

1.16

0.87–1.56

.314

1.17

0.87–1.57

.311

 > 5 to 10 years of experience

1.04

0.80–1.35

.793

1.04

0.80–1.36

.760

1.02

0.79–1.34

.861

0.99

0.76–1.30

.955

 > 10 years of experience

Ref

–

–

Ref

–

–

Ref

–

–

Ref

–

–

School-level

Pre-school

–

–

–

1.17

0.75–1.82

.492

1.18

0.75–1.83

.475

1.28

0.81–2.01

.287

Pre-and compulsory school

–

–

–

1.64

0.92–2.94

.096

1.71

0.95–3.08

.072

1.81

1.00–3.27

.052

Compulsory school

–

–

–

1.44

0.94–2.21

.092

1.45

0.95–2.22

.088

1.54

1.00–2.38

.051

Upper secondary school

–

–

–

1.24

0.77–1.97

.375

1.23

0.77–1.96

.397

1.29

0.80–2.08

.295

Adult education

–

–

–

Ref

–

–

Ref

–

–

Ref

–

–

Self-rated health

Poor, Neither good nor poor (= 0) vs. good, very good (= 1)

–

–

–

–

–

–

2.08

1.54–2.81

 < 0.001

2.09

1.54–2.83

 < 0.001

Self-efficacy, effect per unit increase in mean score (1–5)

Mean score

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

2.01

1.60–2.53

 < 0.001

  1. 1 Model 1: Estimates are adjusted for GMSI-scores and length of work experience as a principal. Naglekerke R2 was 0.189.2 Model 2: Estimates are adjusted for model 1 and school level. Naglekerke R2 was 0.19.3 Model 3: Estimates are adjusted for model 2 and self-rated health. Naglekerke R2 was 0.21.4 Model 4: Estimates are adjusted for model 3 and self-efficacy. Naglekerke R2 was 0.23
  2. Figures in bold are statistically significant p ≤ 0.05