Criteria for assessment in JBI | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBI for quasi-experimental | |||||||||
Study | Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and what is the ‘effect’? | Were the participants included in any comparisons similar? | Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the exposure or intervention of interest? | Was there a control group? | Were there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre and post the intervention/exposure? | Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up adequately described and analyzed? | Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way? | Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? | Was appropriate statistical analysis used? |
Lee et al. [13] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
Malagón-Amor et al. [39] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
Law et al. [74] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ? | ✓ |
Yokoyama et al. [18] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | N/A |
Chan [75] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
JBI for case control | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Were the groups comparable other than the presence of disease in cases or the absence of disease in controls? | Were the groups comparable other than the presence of disease in cases or the absence of disease in controls? | Were the same criteria used for identification of cases and controls? | Was exposure measured in a standard, valid and reliable way? | Was exposure measured in the same way for cases and controls? | Were confounding factors identified? | Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Were outcomes assessed in a standard, valid and reliable way for cases and controls? | Was the exposure period of interest long enough to be meaningful? | Was appropriate statistical analysis used? |
Katsuki et al. [65] | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | N/A | ✓ |
JBI for analytical cohort | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? | Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? | Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Were confounding factors identified? | Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study? | Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? | Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? | Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? | Was appropriate statistical analysis used? |
Yuen et al. [35] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
JBI for analytical cross-sectional | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Were confounding factors identified? | Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Was appropriate statistical analysis used? |
Kondo et al. [40] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ |
Krieg and Dickie [37] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ |
Nagata et al. [64] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ |
Chan and Lo [4] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ |
Uchida and Norasakkunkit [58] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ |
Umeda et al. [63] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Yuen et al. [41] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ |
Yong and Nomura [43] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ |
Wu et al. [42] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
JBI for prevalence cross-sectional | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population? | Were study participants sampled in an appropriate way? | Was the sample size adequate? | Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample? | Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition? | Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants? | Was there appropriate statistical analysis? | Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately? |
Koyama et al. [62] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Malagón-Amor et al. [59] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Chauliac et al. [38] | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | N/A |
Frankova [61] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
JBI for case series | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Were there clear criteria for inclusion in the case series? | Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants included in the case series? | Were valid methods used for identification of the condition for all participants included in the case series? | Did the case series have consecutive inclusion of participants? | Did the case series have complete inclusion of participants? | Was there clear reporting of the demographics of the participants in the study? | Was there clear reporting of clinical information of the participants? | Were the outcomes or follow up results of cases clearly reported? | Was there clear reporting of the presenting site(s)/clinic(s) demographic information? | Was statistical analysis appropriate? |
Teo et al. [36] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
JBI for Case Reports/Studies | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Were patient’s demographic characteristics clearly described? | Was the patient’s history clearly described and presented as a timeline? | Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described? | Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described? | Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described? | Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly described? | Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described? | Does the case report provide takeaway lessons? |
Sakamoto et al. [47] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Hattori [73] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ |
Suwa and Suzuki [51] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ | X |
Teo [49] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ |
Overjero et al. (2014) | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ |
Ranieri [46] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ? | ✓ | X | ✓ |
Kato et al. [44] | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | X |
Ranieri [46] | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Matsuguma et al. [77] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | X | ✓ |
Silić et al. (2019) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ |
Roza et al. [72] | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ |
JBI for Qualitative | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology? | Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives? | Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data? | Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data? | Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results? | Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically? | Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed? | Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented? | Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body? | Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data? |
Ogino [56] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | X | ✓ |
Kaneko [52] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
Wong and Ying [54] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
Wong [6] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ? | ✓ |
Wong [70] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Tajan [11] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
Rubinstein [71] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
Yong and Kaneko [57] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Li and Wong [53] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ |
Criteria for assessment for MMAT | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMAT for mixed method | |||||||||||||||||
Study | Are there clear research questions? | Do the collected data allow to address the research questions? | Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? | Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? | Are the findings adequately derived from the data? | Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? | Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation? | Are the participants representative of the target population? | Are measurements appropriate regarding both the outcome and exposure/intervention? | Are there complete outcome data? | Are the confounders accounted for in the design and analysis? | During the study period, is the intervention/exposure administered as intended? | Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? | Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? | Are the results adequately brought together into overall interpretations? | Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? | Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved? |
Chan and Lo [60] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Chan [76] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Chan [55] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |