Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the multiple mediation model for sleep irregularity regarding depression and anxiety

From: The mediating effect of cognitive appraisal on the relationship between sleep habits and the stress response among Japanese female college students

 

Depression

Anxiety

b

SE

t value

b

SE

t value

Partial effects of covariates on stress response

 Stressor

1.07

.24

4.39**

.96

.24

4.07**

 Optimism

− .56

.10

− 5.61**

− .20

.10

− 2.06*

Effects of sleep irregularity on mediators

 Commitment

.38

.05

8.17**

.38

.05

8.17**

 Appraisal of influence

.02

.04

.51

.02

.04

.51

 Appraisal of threat

.48

.06

8.58**

.48

.06

8.58**

 Controllability

− .28

.04

− 7.30**

− .28

.04

− 7.30**

Direct mediating effects on stress response

 Commitment

.10

.08

1.28

.29

.08

3.66**

 Appraisal of influence

.13

.09

1.54

.06

.08

.75

 Appraisal of threat

.12

.07

1.76

− .15

.06

− 2.26*

 Controllability

.00

.08

.03

− .04

.08

− .50

Effects of sleep irregularity on stress response

 Total

.12

.05

2.24*

.06

.05

1.10

 Direct

.03

.07

.40

.01

.06

.12

Indirect effects

b

SE

95% BCa CI

b

SE

95% BCa CI

 Total

.10

.04

(.02; .18)

.05

.04

(− .02; .13)

 Commitment

.04

.03

(− .02; .10)

.11

.03

(.05; .18)

 Appraisal of Influence

.00

.01

(− .01; .02)

.00

.00

(− .01; .01)

 Appraisal of threat

.06

.03

(− .00; .12)

− .07

.03

(− .14; − .01)

 Controllability

.00

.03

(− .05; .05)

.01

.03

(− .04; .07)

Model statistics

R

R2

F (7, 279)

R

R2

F (7, 279)

 

.52

.27

14.51**

.39

.15

7.15**

  1. *p < .05, **p < .01