Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk ratios of the associations between family social conditions and psychological distress: the mediating role of lifestyle factors (n = 742)

From: Associations between family social circumstances and psychological distress among the university students of Bangladesh: To what extent do the lifestyle factors mediate?

Family social conditions

Model 1: Age and gender-adjusted

Model 1 + Physical inactivity

Model 1 + Smoking

Model 1 + Fruit consumption

Model 1 + alcohol consumption

Model 1 + Poor sleep quality

Fully adjusted model: Model 1 + physical inactivity, smoking, fruit consumption, alcohol consumption, and sleep quality

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

Change in RR

(%) *

Childhood poverty

 No (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 

 Yes

1.31

(1.11, 1.55)

1.32

(1.12, 1.56)

1.30

(1.10, 1.54)

1.28

(1.08, 1.51)

1.31

(1.11, 1.55)

1.28

(1.08, 1.51)

1.26

(1.06, 1.49)

16

 Don’t remember

1.21

(0.99, 1.49)

1.24

(1.01, 1.52)

1.20

(0.98, 1.47)

1.20

(0.98, 1.47)

1.22

(0.99, 1.49)

1.21

(0.99, 1.48)

1.19

(0.98, 1.46)

10

Family SEP

 High (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 

 Medium

1.04

(0.88, 1.24)

1.03

(0.86, 1.22)

1.03

(0.87, 1.23)

1.03

(0.87, 1.23)

1.04

(0.87, 1.24)

1.04

(0.87, 1.22)

1.02

(0.86, 1.20)

50

 Low

1.36

(1.07, 1.73)

1.35

(1.06, 1.71)

1.34

(1.05, 1.71)

1.32

(1.04, 1.69)

1.36

(1.07, 1.73)

1.38

(1.09, 1.74)

1.33

(1.05, 1.68)

8

Parents’ marital status

 Married (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 

 Unmarried

0.77

(0.55, 1.08)

0.77

(0.55, 1.07)

0.78

(0.56, 1.10)

0.75

(0.53, 1.05)

0.77

(0.55, 1.08)

0.75

(0.54, 1.05)

0.75

(0.54, 1.05)

9

Living with family

 Yes (ref.)

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 

 No

1.28

(1.07, 1.54)

1.29

(1.08, 1.54)

1.30

(1.09, 1.56)

1.23

(1.03, 1.48)

1.28

(1.07, 1.54)

1.30

(1.09, 1.55)

1.28

(1.06, 1.53)

0

  1. RR, Risk Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; SEP, Socio-economic Position
  2. *Calculated using the formula: (Total Effect from model 1 − Direct Effect from fully adjusted model)/(Total Effect from model 1 − 1) * 100.