Skip to main content

Table 5 The mediating effect of youth’s sports’ values on the link between parents’ role-modeling behaviors and youth’s sports-participation behaviors

From: Immigrant and Swedish adolescents’ involvement in organized sports activities: an expectancy-value approach

    

95% CI

 

B

SE

t/z

LL

UL

Outcome: Sports participation

     

 Direct effects

     

  Role modeling → Sports’ values

.01

.03

.22

− .06

.07

  Role modeling → Sports participation

.22

.12

1.89

− .01

.45

  Sports’ values → Sports participation

.82

.19

4.36***

.45

1.19

 Indirect effect

     

  Role modeling → Sports’ values → Sports participation

.01

.03

 

− .06

.07

Outcome: Sports intensity

     

 Direct effects

     

  Role modeling → Sports’ values

.03

.04

.66

− .05

.11

  Role modeling → Sports intensity

.05

.27

.27

− .32

.42

  Sports’ values → Sports intensity

1.07

.27

3.93***

.53

1.61

 Indirect effect

     

  Role modeling → Sports’ values → Sports intensity

.03

.05

 

− .01

.03

Outcome: Sports continuation

     

 Direct effects

     

  Role modeling → Sports’ values

.08

.04

2.28*

.01

.17

  Role modeling → Sports continuation

.11

.14

.77

− .16

.38

  Sports’ values → Sports continuation

.57

.20

2.90**

.18

.95

 Indirect effect

     

  Role modeling → Sports’ values → Sports continuation

.05

.03

 

.00

.12

  1. Unstandardized beta coefficients (B), 95% ordinary least squares CI for B, and 95% bootstrap CI for the indirect effects. The following variables were entered as covariates: SES, age, gender, immigrant background, and sports-related family co-activities. We also controlled for T1 sports participation when looking at T2 sports participation, and T1 sports intensity when looking at T2 sports intensity
  2. CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit; UL upper limit
  3. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001