| |
Past focus
|
Future focus
|
Current focus
|
|---|
|
Item 6
|
.877
|
− .031
|
− .033
|
|
Item 1
|
.771
|
− .044
|
.009
|
|
Item 11
|
.728
|
.043
|
− .013
|
|
Item 9
|
.625
|
.039
|
.046
|
|
Item 7
|
− .003
|
.831
|
− .040
|
|
Item 12
|
− .011
|
.816
|
.000
|
|
Item 3
|
.018
|
.757
|
.042
|
|
Item 8
|
− .008
|
− .047
|
.751
|
|
Item 4
|
.060
|
.087
|
.704
|
|
Item 2
|
− .042
|
− .037
|
.672
|
|
α
|
.84
|
.84
|
.75
|
|
ω
|
.84
|
.84
|
.75
|
|
λ6
|
.80
|
.78
|
.67
|
|
r*
|
.56
|
.64
|
.50
|
- Extraction Method: Maximum Likelihood. Rotation Method: Promax with Kaiser Normalization. Rotation converged in 4 iterations. Item number relates to Shipp et al. 2009. α = Cronbach’s alpha; ω = McDonald’s omega; λ6 = Gutmann’s lamda; r* = average inter-item correlation
