Skip to main content

Table 3 Multiple regression analyses with HSCL depression as the dependent variable (N = 420)

From: The relationship between resilience and loneliness elucidated by a Danish version of the resilience scale for adults

  

Men (n = 136)

 

Women (n = 284)

 

R-sq

Crude

Adj 1

Adj 2

Adj 3

CI 95%

R-sq

Crude

Adj 1

Adj 2

Adj 3

CI 95%

Risk variable

.406

     

.384

     

 Loneliness

 

.75a

.36a

.14

.13

−.08 | .32

 

.57a

.23a

.15b

.11c

.00 | .21

Protection

.600

     

.617

     

 RSA pc

  

−.26b

−.12

−.17c

−.35 | .01

  

−.29a

−.16a

−.19a

−.29 | -.09

 RSA fut

  

−.23b

-.16c

−.14

−.30 | .05

  

−.24a

−.20b

−.17b

−.29 | -.03

 RSA sc

  

.10

.02

−.01

−.19 | .18

  

−.03

−.01

.00

−.09 | .08

 RSA fc

  

−.19c

−.08

−.18c

−.36 | -.02

  

−.06

−.05

−.06

−.19 | .06

 RSA sr

  

−.10

−.11

.06

−.18 | .32

  

−.06

.00

.04

−.12 | .18

 RSA ss

  

−.04

.03

.04

−.09 | .19

  

−.03

.00

−.03

−.12 | .06

 SOC

.661

  

−.47a

-.38b

−.59 | -.17

.649

  

−.34a

−.32a

−.44 | −.20

Interactions

.712

     

.678

     

 Lonely × RSApc

    

−.16c

−.30 | .02

      

 Lonely × RSAfc

    

−.20b

−.34 | −.06

      

 Lonely × SOC

          

−.17a

−.25 | −.09

Covariates

.706

     

.685

     
  1. a p < .001, b p < .01 and c p < .05. No. of resamplings = 1000. Covariates were: Age (yrs), marital status (single/cohabitation), children (no/yes), Education (teacher, nurse, biomechanics vs other), pets (no/yes), engage in sports (no/yes). RSA pc/fut/sc/fc/sr/ss = personal competence / planned future / social competence / family cohesion / social resources / structured style, SOC = Sense of Coherence