Table 3 Probabilities of PST and MT having effects on the analyzed variables
Concept | Measurement | Subscale(s) | Probabilities |
|---|---|---|---|
Mindfulness | FFMQ-SF | Acting with awareness | MT > WL = 57%; PST > WL = 41%; MT > PST = 66% |
Nonjudging of inner experience | MT > WL = 98%; PST > WL = 43%; MT > PST = 98% | ||
Nonreactivity to inner experience | MT > WL = 98%; PST > WL = 81%; MT > PST = 92% | ||
Use of psychological skills | TOPS | Self-talk | MT > WL = 58%; PST > WL = 95%; PST > MT = 91% |
Imagery | MT > WL = 76%; PST > WL = 98%; PST > MT = 87% | ||
Goal setting | MT > WL = 95%; PST > WL = 99%; PST > MT = 68% | ||
Activation | MT > WL = 100%; PST > WL = 100%; PST > MT = 96% | ||
Relaxation | MT > WL = 100%; PST > WL = 100%; PST > MT = 96% | ||
Techniques to handle emotions | MT > WL = 100%; PST > WL = 100%; PST > MT = 38% | ||
Techniques to regulate attention | MT > WL = 75%; PST > WL = 100%; PST > MT = 96% | ||
Emotion regulation | TOPS | Emotional control | MT > WL = 99%; PST > WL = 99%; MT > PST = 63% |
Experiential avoidancea | AAQ-II | – | MT > WL = 96%; PST > WL = 65%; MT > PST = 92% |
Emotional competencies | SEC-27 | Acceptance of emotions | MT > WL = 100%; PST > WL = 96%; MT > PST = 88% |
Attentional regulation | TOPS | Attention control | MT > WL = 89%; PST > WL = 91%; MT > PST = 46% |
Cognitive interferencea | TOQS | Thoughts of escape | MT > WL = 78%; PST > WL = 38%; MT > PST = 84% |
Situation-irrelevant thoughts | MT > WL = 18%; PST > WL = 17%; MT > PST = 49% | ||
Performance worries | MT > WL = 95%; PST > WL = 88%; MT > PST = 71% | ||
TOPS | Negative cognitions | MT > WL = 100%; PST > WL = 100%; MT > PST = 58% | |
Decentering | EQ | Distanced perspective | MT > WL = 100%; PST > WL = 74%; MT > PST > 98% |
Dealing with failures | ASOAF6 | Action orientation | MT > WL = 82%; PST > WL = 89%; MT > PST = 41% |
State orientationa | MT > WL = 84%; PST > WL = 71%; MT > PST = 64% |