Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean differences between canonical and modified stimuli in aesthetic and proportion judgments task for both groups (ASD and TD), separately

From: Discrepancies between explicit and implicit evaluation of aesthetic perception ability in individuals with autism: a potential way to improve social functioning

Golden Beauty task Group (I) Canonical stimuli type
Mean (SE)
(J) Modified stimuli type
Mean (SE)
Meandiff (I-J)
(SE)
P
Aesthetic Judgment task ASD group 10.300 (.715) 9.500 (.431) .800 (.801) .331
TD group 15.500 (.715) 11.100 (.431) 4.400 (.801) .0001
Proportion judgment task ASD group 14.500 (.962) 13.000 (1.301) 1.500 (.922) .121
TD group 19.300 (.962) 8.900 (1.301) 10.400 (.922) .0001
  1. Significant comparisons are highlighted in bold