Skip to main content

Table 2 Number and percent of non-right-handers (NRH) and right handers (RH) by sample and sex for four handedness direction indicators

From: Prevalence and heritability of handedness in a Hong Kong Chinese twin and singleton sample

 

Twins

Singletons

Total

Handedness Direction

Male

n (%)

Female

n (%)

χ2(df = 1)

Male

n (%)

Female

n (%)

χ2(df = 1)

Twins

n (%)

Singletons

n (%)

χ2(df = 1)

Writing hand

 NRH

17 (9.1%)

14 (7.1%)

0.51

19 (8.6%)

14 (6.9%)

0.46

31 (8.1%)

33 (7.8%)

0.02

 RH

170 (90.9%)

183 (92.9%)

 

201 (91.4%)

190 (93.1%)

 

353 (91.9%)

391 (92.2%)

 

Drawing hand

 NRH

26 (13.9%)

21 (10.7%)

0.94

27 (12.3%)

29 (14.2%)

0.35

47 (12.2%)

56 (13.2%)

0.17

 RH

161 (86.1%)

176 (89.3%)

 

193 (87.7%)

175 (85.8%)

 

337 (87.8%)

368 (86.8%)

 

EHI2

 NRH

13 (7.0%)

12 (6.1%)

0.12

20 (9.1%)

16 (7.8%)

0.21

25 (6.5%)

36 (8.5%)

1.13

 RH

174 (93.0%)

185 (93.9%)

 

200 (90.9%)

188 (92.2%)

 

359 (93.5%)

388 (91.5%)

 

PegQ2

 NRH

23 (12.1%)

29 (14.2%)

0.38

40 (18.1%)

25 (12.2%)

2.87

52 (13.2%)

65 (15.3%)

0.71

 RH

167 (87.9%)

175 (85.8%)

 

181 (81.9%)

180 (87.8%)

 

342 (86.8%)

361 (84.7%)

 
  1. 1) For the binary classification of ‘writing hand’ and ‘drawing hand’, NRH includes both left-hand preference and no preference
  2. 2) EHI2 and PegQ2 are the binary classification of EHI and PegQ scores respectively, using zero as the cutoff point. NRH refers to those who scored less or equal to zero. There are 4 participants (including 1 twin and 3 singletons) who scored exactly zero on EHI