BMC Psychology

Table 3 Simple and multiple regression results (β (SE)) for predicting of SCSDA by alexithymia and attachment (mother, father and peer)

From: The relation of alexithymia and attachment with type 1 diabetes management in adolescents: a gender-specific analysis

	Girls				Boys
	unadjusted		adjusted		unadjusted		adjusted
Predictors	β (SE)	P	β (SE)	P	β (SE)	P	β (SE)	P
Alexithymia
DIF	−0.07 (0.03)	0.02	−0.06 (0.03)	0.04	−0.03 (0.03)	0.40	−0.11 (0.04)	0.01
DDF	−0.09 (0.04)	0.03	−0.07 (0.04)	0.13	−0.02 (0.05)	0.66	−0.16 (0.06)	0.02
total	−0.05 (0.02)	0.01	−0.04 (0.02)	0.05	−0.02 (0.02)	0.47	−0.08 (0.03)	0.01
Mother Attachment
Mother-Trust	0.02 (0.01)	0.27	0.001 (0.02)	0.99	0.04 (0.02)	0.04	0.04 (0.02)	0.07
Mother-Communication	0.03 (0.02)	0.06	0.01 (0.02)	0.45	0.05 (0.02)	0.02	0.04 (0.02)	0.04
Mother-Alienation	−0.04 (0.02)	0.03	−0.03 (0.02)	0.13	−0.04 (0.02)	0.12	−0.06 (0.03)	0.03
total	0.002 (0.01)	0.83	−0.01 (0.01)	0.49	0.02 (0.01)	0.06	0.01 (0.02)	0.44
Father Attachment
Father-trust	0.03 (0.01)	0.004	0.02 (0.01)	0.08	0.03 (0.02)	0.05	0.02 (0.02)	0.25
Father-communication	0.04 (0.01)	0.002	0.02 (0.02)	0.19	0.03 (0.01)	0.03	0.02 (0.02)	0.15
Father-Alienation	−0.04 (0.02)	0.04	−0.04 (0.03)	0.20	−0.05 (0.02)	0.01	−0.06 (0.02)	0.01
total	0.02 (0.01)	0.003	0.01 (0.01)	0.17	0.02 (0.01)	0.01	0.01 (0.01)	0.60
Peer attachment
Peer-Trust	0.03 (0.02)	0.04	0.01 (0.02)	0.50	0.01 (0.01)	0.32	0.01 (0.02)	0.61
Peer-communication	0.04 (0.02)	0.02	0.02 (0.02)	0.30	0.002 (0.02)	0.88	−0.004 (0.02)	0.84
Peer – Alienation	−0.004 (0.03)	0.86	−0.02 (0.03)	0.53	−0.04 (0.03)	0.21	−0.09 (0.04)	0.03
total	0.03 (0.01)	0.005	0.01 (0.01)	0.29	−0.01 (0.01)	0.58	−0.01 (0.01)	0.39

Adjustment was conducted by age, BMI and parent history of diabetes

Back to article page

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com