Skip to main content

Table 3 Simple and multiple regression results (β (SE)) for predicting of SCSDA by alexithymia and attachment (mother, father and peer)

From: The relation of alexithymia and attachment with type 1 diabetes management in adolescents: a gender-specific analysis

 GirlsBoys
unadjustedadjustedunadjustedadjusted
Predictorsβ (SE)Pβ (SE)Pβ (SE)Pβ (SE)P
Alexithymia
DIF−0.07 (0.03)0.02−0.06 (0.03)0.04−0.03 (0.03)0.40−0.11 (0.04)0.01
DDF−0.09 (0.04)0.03−0.07 (0.04)0.13−0.02 (0.05)0.66−0.16 (0.06)0.02
total−0.05 (0.02)0.01−0.04 (0.02)0.05−0.02 (0.02)0.47−0.08 (0.03)0.01
Mother Attachment
Mother-Trust0.02 (0.01)0.270.001 (0.02)0.990.04 (0.02)0.040.04 (0.02)0.07
Mother-Communication0.03 (0.02)0.060.01 (0.02)0.450.05 (0.02)0.020.04 (0.02)0.04
Mother-Alienation−0.04 (0.02)0.03−0.03 (0.02)0.13−0.04 (0.02)0.12−0.06 (0.03)0.03
total0.002 (0.01)0.83−0.01 (0.01)0.490.02 (0.01)0.060.01 (0.02)0.44
Father Attachment
Father-trust0.03 (0.01)0.0040.02 (0.01)0.080.03 (0.02)0.050.02 (0.02)0.25
Father-communication0.04 (0.01)0.0020.02 (0.02)0.190.03 (0.01)0.030.02 (0.02)0.15
Father-Alienation−0.04 (0.02)0.04−0.04 (0.03)0.20−0.05 (0.02)0.01−0.06 (0.02)0.01
total0.02 (0.01)0.0030.01 (0.01)0.170.02 (0.01)0.010.01 (0.01)0.60
Peer attachment
Peer-Trust0.03 (0.02)0.040.01 (0.02)0.500.01 (0.01)0.320.01 (0.02)0.61
Peer-communication0.04 (0.02)0.020.02 (0.02)0.300.002 (0.02)0.88−0.004 (0.02)0.84
Peer – Alienation−0.004 (0.03)0.86−0.02 (0.03)0.53−0.04 (0.03)0.21−0.09 (0.04)0.03
total0.03 (0.01)0.0050.01 (0.01)0.29−0.01 (0.01)0.58−0.01 (0.01)0.39
  1. Adjustment was conducted by age, BMI and parent history of diabetes