Skip to main content

Table 2 Simple and multiple linear regression results (β (SE)) for predicting of A1C by alexithymia and attachment (mother, father and peer)

From: The relation of alexithymia and attachment with type 1 diabetes management in adolescents: a gender-specific analysis

 GirlsBoys
unadjustedadjustedunadjustedadjusted
Predictorsβ (SE)Pβ (SE)Pβ (SE)Pβ (SE)P
Alexithymia
DIF0.16 (0.06)0.010.15 (0.07)0.03−0.07 (0.07)0.37− 0.07 (0.10)0.48
DDF0.17 (0.08)0.040.10 (0.09)0.26−0.10 (0.11)0.35−0.10 (0.14)0.48
total0.11 (0.04)0.010.09 (0.04)0.05−0.04 (0.05)0.33−0.05 (0.06)0.43
Mother Attachment
Mother-Trust−0.02 (0.03)0.60−0.03 (0.03)0.31−0.01 (0.04)0.81−0.04 (0.05)0.36
Mother-Communication−0.07 (0.03)0.03−0.08 (0.04)0.03−0.03 (0.04)0.49−0.02 (0.05)0.69
Mother-Alienation0.05 (0.04)0.190.07 (0.05)0.17−0.02 (0.05)0.650.01 (0.07)0.86
total−0.03 (0.02)0.28−0.03 (0.02)0.220.001 (0.03)0.980.001 (0.04)0.99
Father Attachment
Father-trust−0.02 (0.02)0.40−0.02 (0.03)0.44−0.02 (0.03)0.65−0.04 (0.04)0.35
Father-communication−0.03 (0.02)0.21−0.04 (0.03)0.21−0.05 (0.03)0.11−0.04 (0.04)0.23
Father-Alienation0.06 (0.04)0.130.07 (0.05)0.170.002 (0.04)0.970.03 (0.06)0.62
total−0.01 (0.02)0.43−0.02 (0.02)0.30−0.03 (0.02)0.24−0.02 (0.02)0.37
Peer attachment
Peer-Trust−0.05 (0.03)0.12−0.01 (0.04)0.690.004 (0.03)0.890.01 (0.04)0.69
Peer-communication−0.05 (0.03)0.12−0.03 (0.03)0.49−0.03 (0.04)0.42−0.01 (0.04)0.90
Peer – Alienation−0.06 (0.05)0.21−0.10 (0.06)0.100.02 (0.06)0.740.05 (0.09)0.55
total−0.04 (0.02)0.03−0.04 (0.03)0.150.001 (0.02)0.970.01 (0.03)0.57
  1. Adjustment was conducted by age, BMI and parent history of diabetes