Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of hierarchical linear regression analysis for variables predicting net-score in the IGT

From: The role of inhibition capacities in the Iowa gambling test performance in young tattooed women

  Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Variable B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β
GoNoGo
 Education .69 1.40 .04 .15 1.36 .01 .24 1.40 .01
 Smoking −2.52 2.81 −.08 2.64 3.05 .09 2.74 3.09 .09
 Tattoo     −10.08 2.83 −.37** −15.26 18.80 −.56
 Sum RT     .00 .00 .12 .00 .00 .09
 Tattoo X Sum RT        .00 .01 .20
R2 .01    .11    .11   
F for change in R2 .75    6.37**    .07   
MFFT
 Education     .39 1.36 .02 .56 1.36 .03
 Smoking     1.92 3.04 .06 1.25 3.08 .04
 Tattoo     −8.95 2.73 −.33** −12.89 4.09 −.47**
 Error     −.05 .42 −.01 −.65 −.63 −.13
 Tattoo X Error        1.12 .86 .24
R2     .09    .11   
F for change in R2     5.35**    1.67   
Stroop
 Education     .21 1.36 .01 .38 1.33 .02
 Smoking     1.7 3.01 .05 1.77 3.02 .06
 Tattoo     −8.82 2.72 −.32** −13.58 6.30 −.50*
 Interference RT     −.01 .01 −.10 −.02 .01 −.17
 Tattoo X          
 Interference RT        .02 .02 .21
R2     .10    .11   
F for change in R2     6.04**    .70   
  1. Note. *p < .05. **p < .01