Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of hierarchical linear regression analysis for variables predicting net-score in the IGT

From: The role of inhibition capacities in the Iowa gambling test performance in young tattooed women

 Model 1Model 2Model 3
VariableBSE BβBSE BβBSE Bβ
GoNoGo
 Education.691.40.04.151.36.01.241.40.01
 Smoking−2.522.81−.082.643.05.092.743.09.09
 Tattoo   −10.082.83−.37**−15.2618.80−.56
 Sum RT   .00.00.12.00.00.09
 Tattoo X Sum RT      .00.01.20
R2.01  .11  .11  
F for change in R2.75  6.37**  .07  
MFFT
 Education   .391.36.02.561.36.03
 Smoking   1.923.04.061.253.08.04
 Tattoo   −8.952.73−.33**−12.894.09−.47**
 Error   −.05.42−.01−.65−.63−.13
 Tattoo X Error      1.12.86.24
R2   .09  .11  
F for change in R2   5.35**  1.67  
Stroop
 Education   .211.36.01.381.33.02
 Smoking   1.73.01.051.773.02.06
 Tattoo   −8.822.72−.32**−13.586.30−.50*
 Interference RT   −.01.01−.10−.02.01−.17
 Tattoo X         
 Interference RT      .02.02.21
R2   .10  .11  
F for change in R2   6.04**  .70  
  1. Note. *p < .05. **p < .01