Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “It all needs to be a full jigsaw, not just bits”: exploration of healthcare professionals’ beliefs towards supported self-management for long-term conditions

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Dec 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Clague
18 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanna Hudson
11 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Niall Charles Anderson
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Clague
3 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanna Hudson
12 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Niall Charles Anderson
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
29 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Niall Charles Anderson
Resubmission - Version 4
29 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Niall Charles Anderson
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Jun 2019 Editorially accepted
24 Jun 2019 Article published 10.1186/s40359-019-0319-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement