Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power associated with using impairment on neurocognitive measures to predict rates of below grade level academic performance
| Â | Reading below grade level | Mathematics below grade level | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neurocognitive Measure, Cutoff | Sensitivity, % (95% CI) | Specificity, % (95% CI) | Positive Predictive Value, % (95% CI) | Negative Predictive Value, % (95% CI) | Sensitivity, % (95% CI) | Specificity, % (95% CI) | Positive Predictive Value, % (95% CI) | Negative Predictive Value, % (95% CI) |
BRIEF-MCI, T > 65 | 26 (7–46) | 88 (75–100) | 63 (29–96) | 61 (45–77) | 41 (18–65) | 96 (88–100) | 88 (65–100) | 71 (55–86) |
CogState Composite, z < − 1 | 26 (7–46) | 92 (81–100) | 71 (38–100) | 62 (47–78) | 29 (8–51) | 92 (81–100) | 71 (38–100) | 66 (38–100) |
BRIEF-MCI, T > 65 or CogState Composite, z < −1 | 47 (25–70) | 84 (70–98) | 69 (44–94) | 68 (51–84) | 59 (35–82) | 88 (75–100) | 77 (54–100) | 76 (60–91) |