Skip to main content

Table 1 Study Sample Characteristics and Differences between Children Screened Negative vs. Positive for Behavior Problems

From: Validation of a cross-cultural instrument for child behavior problems: the Disruptive Behavior International Scale – Nepal version

Characteristic

Screen negativea (n = 137)

Screen positivea (n = 131)

Overall Sample (N = 268)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Sex (% female)

53 (39.0)

59 (45.0)

112 (42.0)

Mean Age (SD)

10.5 (2.9)*

9.7 (2.7)*

10.2 (2.8)

Parents’ marital status

 Married

132 (96.4)

126 (96.2)

258 (96.3)

 Divorced

0 (0)

1 (0.8)

1 (0.4)

 Widowed

3 (2.2)

2 (1.53)

5 (1.9)

 Separated

1 (0.7)

0 (0)

1 (0.4)

 Re-married

1 (0.7)

2 (1.5)

3 (1.1)

Family type

 Nuclear family

81 (59.1)

74 (57.4)

155 (58.3)

 Extended family

56 (40.9)

55 (42.6)

111 (41.7)

Caste/ethnicity

 Bahun/Chhetri

44 (32.4)

46 (35.1)

90 (33.6)

 Dalit

8 (5.9)

5 (3.8)

14 (5.2)

 Tharu

37 (27.2)

31 (23.7)

68 (25.4)

 Kumal

24 (17.7)

34 (26.0)

58 (21.6)

 Others

23 (16.9)

15 (11.5)

38 (14.2)

Religion

 Hindu

121 (88.3)

123 (93.4)

244 (91.0)

 Buddhist

13 (9.5)

6 (4.6)

19 (7.1)

 Christian

3 (2.2)

2 (1.5)

5 (1.9)

Parent working overseas

44 (32.1)*

61 (46.6)*

105 (39.2)

  1. aScreening status based on initial screening using vignettes
  2. *Significant (unadjusted) difference between screen-negative and screen-positive at p < 0.05 level (by t-test for continuous variables, chi-squared test for categorical variables)