Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome—a reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Coyne
13 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Finbarr Leacy
2 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Carolyn Wilshire
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Finbarr Leacy
19 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Carolyn Wilshire
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Carolyn Wilshire
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Carolyn Wilshire
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Carolyn Wilshire
Resubmission - Version 6
12 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
22 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
22 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s40359-018-0218-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement