Skip to main content

Table 2 Grading of the evidence for the meta-analyses of RCTs investigating the effectiveness of various psychological interventions for pain reduction

From: An umbrella review of the literature on the effectiveness of psychological interventions for pain reduction

Author, Year

Intervention Group

Control group

Type of pain

Total N

Largest Studya, b

Summary random effects (95% CI)a, c

Random P-value d

95% Prediction interval

Egger’s

P-valuea

I2 (%)

Studies

Excess significancee

O/Eg

P-valueh

Associations supported by strong evidence

None of the associations studied was supported by strong evidence

Associations supported by highly suggestive evidence

None of the associations studied was supported by highly suggestive evidence

Associations supported by suggestive evidence

Bernardy K, 2013

CBT

AC/AtC/EDU/TAU/Support

Fibromyalgia, end of treatment

1150

−0.62 (−0.89, −0.34)

−0.30 (−0.45, −0.15)

7.4E-05

−0.69, 0.09

0.37

30

18

4/17.17

NP

Birnie K, 2014

Distraction

NR

Needle-related (children, adolescents), self-reported

2472

0.09 (−0.08, 0.27)

−0.44 (−0.67, −0.21)

2.0E-04

−1.53, 0.65

0.13

86

24

7/3.4

0.07

Dixon K, 2007

CBT/Stress management/HYP

NR

Arthritis

2303

−0.15 (−0.28, −0.02)

−0.20 (−0.30, −0.10)

8.5E-05

−0.37, −0.02

0.02

9

20

5/5.03

NP

Du S, 2011

ASMP/Self-management

WL/ UC/ Conventional/No treatment

Chronic musculoskeletal, 6 m

1018

−0.27 (−0.42, −0.12)

−0.29 (−0.42, −0.16)

6.0E-06

−1.11, 0.53

0.25

0

3

3/2.78

1.00

Du S, 2011

ASMP/Self-management

WL/ UC/ Conventional/No treatment

Chronic musculoskeletal, 4 m

2968

−0.35 (−0.49, −0.20)

−0.23 (−0.36, −0.11)

2.9E-04

−0.59, 0.13

0.73

59

8

4/7.94

NP

Eccleston C, 2014

Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered)

AC/TAU/WL

Chronic (Non-HA), post-treatment

1785

−0.20 (−0.36, −0.05)

−0.37 (−0.59, −0.15)

9.9E-04

−1.12, 0.38

0.42

77

11

5/5.96

NP

Henrich J, 2015

Psychological therapies

Control

Irritable bowel syndrome

2245

0.05 (−0.19, 0.28)

0.40 (0.30, 0.51)

3.3E-14

0.09, 0.72

0.01

26

32

9/2.22

<0.001

Johannsen M, 2013

EDU/RIMH/SGT

WL/ St. Care/ NR

Breast cancer patients/survivors

1500

0.09 (−0.14, 0.31)

0.34 (0.18, 0.50)

3.3E-05

−0.15, 0.82

0.06

50

15

6/2.24

0.02

Knittle K, 2010

Self-regulation

WL/St. Care/No Intervention

Rheumatoid Arthritis

1316

0.13 (−0.16, 0.41)

0.18 (0.07, 0.29)

8.9E-04

0.07, 0.30

0.53

0

22

1/3.73

NP

Kroon FP, 2014

SMP

UC/WL/No treatment

Osteoarthritis, IT

2271

−0.29 (−0.51, −0.07)

−0.17 (−0.26, −0.08)

1.6E-04

−0.27, −0.07

0.12

0

13

2/10.85

NP

Macea DD, 2010

Web-based CBT interventions

Control

Chronic pain

2958

0.28 (0.13, 0.42)

0.29 (0.15, 0.43)

6.3E-05

−0.07, 0.64

0.11

45

11

3/6.99

NP

Sheinfeld Gorin S, 2012

Psychological intervention

Control

Cancer Pain severity

4270

0.14 (−0.08, 0.36)

0.34 (0.23, 0.46)

7.2E-09

−0.21, 0.89

0.67

60

38

17/9.63

0.01

Associations supported by weak evidence

Adachi T, 2013

Hypnosis

St. Care

Chronic, post-intervention

46

0.64 (−0.27, 1.55)

1.10 (0.17, 2.02)

0.020

NA

NA

48

2

1/1.52

NP

Aqqarwal VR, 2011

Any psychosocial intervention

Usual treatment

Muscle palpation, >3 m

143

−1.11 (−1.63, −0.59) i

−1.09 (−1.56, −0.61)i

7.0E-06

−4.15, 1.98

0.61

0

3

1/2.05

NP

Aqqarwal VR, 2011

CBT

Usual treatment

Orofacial, >3 m

383

−0.32 (−0.66, 0.01)

−0.25 (−0.46, −0.05)

0.014

−0.70, 0.19

0.91

0

4

1/3.11

NP

Aqqarwal VR, 2011

CBT + BFB

Usual treatment

Orofacial, >3 m

196

−0.82 (−1.23, −0.41)

−0.46 (−0.92, 0.00)

0.049

−5.22, 4.30

0.47

53

3

1/3

NP

Aqqarwal VR, 2011

Hypnosis

REL

Orofacial, ≤3 m

81

−1.90 (−3.37, −0.43) i

−1.84 (−3.26, −0.42)i

0.011

NA

NA

0

2

1/1.26

NP

Bernardy K, 2013

CBT

AC/AtC/EDU/TAU/Support

Fibromyalgia (self-efficacy), end of treatment

589

−0.93 (−1.32, −0.54)

−0.39 (−0.73, −0.06)

0.022

−1.50, 0.71

0.88

74

9

5/8.99

NP

Bernardy K, 2013

CBT

AC/AtC/EDU/TAU/Support

Fibromyalgia (self-efficacy), LT

494

−1.01 (−1.40, −0.61)

−0.52 (−1.04, 0.00)

0.049

−2.32, 1.28

0.82

86

8

3/8

NP

Bernardy K, 2013

Operant therapy

AC/EDU/TAU

Fibromyalgia (self-efficacy), LT

123

−1.16 (−1.73, −0.59)

−1.69 (−2.76, −0.62)

0.002

NA

NA

83

2

2/2

1.00

Bernardy K, 2013

CBT

AC/AtC/EDU/TAU/Support

Fibromyalgia, LT

770

−0.37 (−0.74, 0.00)

−0.28 (−0.43, −0.14)

1.3E-04

−0.47, −0.10

0.64

2

13

3/9.36

NP

Bernardy K, 2013

Operant therapy

AC/EDU/TAU

Fibromyalgia, LT

123

−0.76 (−1.31, −0.21)

−1.27 (−2.30, −0.24)

0.015

NA

NA

83

2

2/2

1.00

Damen L, 2006

REL + CBT

Attention placebo

HA Post-treatment

69

0.33 (−0.14, 0.79)

0.39 (0.01, 0.77)

0.045

NA

NA

0

2

0/1.21

NP

Du S, 2011

ASMP/Self-management

WL/ UC/ Conventional/No treatment

Chronic musculoskeletal, 12 m

1570

−0.05 (−0.19, 0.08)

−0.13 (−0.24, −0.03)

0.008

−0.30, 0.03

0.17

0

5

1/0.71

0.53

Eccleston C, 2014

Psychological therapies

Control

Chronic and recurrent HA (children, adolescents), follow-up

251

0.12 (0.02, 0.23)

0.49 (0.08, 0.90)

0.019

−0.76, 1.75

0.00

60

5

2/1.4

0.62

Eccleston C, 2014

Psychological therapies

Control

Chronic and recurrent HA (children, adolescents), post-treatment

714

0.32 (0.13, 0.52)

0.44 (0.28, 0.60)

1.2E-07

0.08, 0.80

0.00

25

15

7/7.46

NP

Eccleston C, 2014

Psychological therapies

Control

Chronic and recurrent non-HA (children, adolescents), post-treatment

852

0.21 (−0.10, 0.51)

−0.57 (−0.86, −0.27)

2.0E-04

−1.63, 0.50

0.00

75

13

5/4.58

0.78

Eccleston C, 2014

Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered)

AC/TAU/WL

Chronic HA, post-treatment

131

0.99 (0.35, 1.64)

1.10 (0.54, 1.65)

1.0E-04

NA

NA

0

2

2/1.94

1.00

Fisher E, 2014

CBT/BFB/REL/HYP

WL/EDU/St. Care/Self-monitoring

Chronic (excluding HA)

672

0.21 (−0.10, 0.51)

−0.60 (−0.91, −0.29)

1.7E-04

−1.63, 0.44

0.00

71

11

4/3.65

0.76

Fisher E, 2014

CBT/BFB/REL/HYP

WL/EDU/St. Care/Self-monitoring

Headache

748

0.25 (−0.03, 0.54)

0.50 (0.34, 0.66)

3.9E-10

0.18, 0.83

0.00

16

18

7/6.65

1.00

Guzman J, 2002

Intensive (>100 h) daily MBPSR with functional restoration

NR

Low back, 3-4 m

165

−0.45 (−0.86, −0.04)

−0.57 (−0.88, −0.26)

3.5E-04

NA

NA

0

2

2/1.94

1.00

Henschke N, 2011

CBT

WL

Chronic low back, ST

239

−0.54 (−0.93, −0.15)

−0.60 (−0.97, −0.23)

0.002

−1.66, 0.46

0.34

43

5

2/4.12

NP

Henschke N, 2011

Operant therapy

WL

Chronic low back, ST

153

−0.63 (−1.12, −0.13)

−0.43 (−0.75, −0.11)

0.009

−2.52, 1.66

0.32

0

3

1/2.95

NP

Henschke N, 2011

Respondent therapy (EMG BFB)

WL

Chronic low back, ST

64

−1.19 (−2.01, −0.37)

−0.80 (−1.32, −0.28)

0.002

−4.17, 2.56

0.76

0

3

1/2.99

NP

Henschke N, 2011

Respondent therapy (progressive REL)

WL

Chronic low back, ST

74

−10.20 (−23.95, 3.55) i

−19.77 (−34.34, −5.20)i

0.008

−175.53, 135.98

0.53

57

3

1/1.94

NP

Kamper SJ, 2014

MBR

UC

Chronic low back, IT

740

−0.24 (−0.50, 0.03)

−0.60 (−0.85, −0.34)

5.1E-06

−1.37, 0.18

0.01

63

6

5/3.95

0.67

Kamper SJ, 2014

MBR

Physical treatment

Chronic low back, IT

531

−0.04 (−0.40, 0.32)

−0.28 (−0.54, −0.01)

0.039

−1.01, 0.45

0.17

51

9

2/0.54

0.10

Kamper SJ, 2014

MBR

UC

Chronic low back, LT

821

−0.32 (−0.60, −0.04)

−0.21 (−0.37, −0.04)

0.013

−0.57, 0.15

0.68

26

7

2/5.94

NP

Kamper SJ, 2014

MBR

UC

Chronic low back, ST

879

−0.20 (−0.46, 0.05)

−0.55 (−0.83, −0.27)

1.0E-04

−1.44, 0.33

0.29

72

9

5/3.94

0.52

Kamper SJ, 2014

MBR

WL

Chronic low back, ST

213

−0.45 (−0.84, −0.06)

−0.73 (−1.22, −0.24)

0.003

−6.10, 4.64

0.78

63

3

2/2.66

NP

Kamper SJ, 2014

MBR

Physical treatment

Chronic low back, ST

1661

−0.15 (−0.36, 0.05)

−0.30 (−0.54, −0.06)

0.015

−1.15, 0.55

0.62

80

12

3/4.53

NP

Kisely SR, 2015

Psychological intervention

No psychological intervention

Chest (frequency), ≤3 m

294

−0.09 (−0.57, 0.39) i

−2.26 (−4.41, −0.11)i

0.039

−8.95, 4.42

0.29

94

7

4/0.45

<0.001

Kisely SR, 2015

Psychological intervention

No psychological intervention

Chest, ≤3 m

172

−0.21 (−0.34, −0.06)

−0.20 (−0.35, −0.05)

0.008

−1.78, 1.38

0.75

58

3

2/2.98

NP

Kisely SR, 2015

Psychological intervention

No psychological intervention

Chest, 3-12 m

111

−0.29 (−0.49, −0.09)

−0.30 (−0.44, −0.15)

6.1E-05

NA

NA

0

2

2/2

1.00

Kroon FP, 2014

SMP

UC/WL/No treatment

Osteoarthritis, ST

755

−0.32 (−0.61, −0.03)

−0.26 (−0.41, −0.11)

8.2E-04

−0.47, −0.04

0.89

0

6

2/5.09

NP

Kroon FP, 2014

SMP

Control

Osteoarthritis, IT

574

−0.22 (−0.45, 0.01)

−0.26 (−0.43, −0.09)

0.003

−1.38, 0.86

0.27

0

3

0/2.16

NP

Lakhan S, 2013

MBT/MBCT

EDU/WL/Support

Irritable bowel syndrome

160

−0.64 (−1.08, −0.20)

−0.59 (−0.91, −0.27)

2.6E-04

NA

NA

0

2

2/2

1.00

Mustafa M, 2013

Supportive/expressive group therapy

Usual treatment

Metastatic breast cancer

279

−0.75 (−1.36, −0.14) i

−0.58 (−0.99, −0.17)i

0.005

−3.21, 2.05

0.90

0

3

1/2.94

NP

Peerdeman K, 2016

Imagery

Control/No treatment

Pain relief

301

0.20 (−0.17, 0.56)

0.24 (0.01, 0.46)

0.039

−0.26, 0.73

0.28

0

4

0/1.6

NP

Peerdeman K, 2016

Verbal suggestion

Control/No treatment

Pain relief

383

0.24 (0.06, 0.41)

0.31 (0.16, 0.46)

6.4E-05

−0.02, 0.64

0.08

0

4

2/2.3

NP

Peerdeman K, 2016

Verbal suggestion/Imagery

Control/No treatment

Affective pain

169

0.16 (−0.27, 0.60)

0.34 (0.07, 0.61)

0.013

−1.41, 2.09

0.70

0

3

1/0.78

1.00

Roldan-Barraza C, 2014

Psychosocial Intervention/Psychosocial Intervention + Usual Treatment

Tailored Usual Treatment

MTMD (self-reported), LT

403

0.80 (0.14, 1.46)

0.66 (0.23, 1.09)

0.003

−2.13, 3.45

0.54

0

3

2/2.94

NP

Theadom A, 2015

Psychological therapies

UC

Fibromyalgia, 6 m

371

−0.38 (−0.75, −0.02)

−0.52 (−0.76, −0.29)

1.5E-05

−1.06, 0.02

0.15

20

5

2/4.12

NP

Theadom A, 2015

Psychological therapies

UC

Fibromyalgia, post-intervention

453

−0.23 (−0.60, 0.15)

−0.33 (−0.52, −0.15)

4.8E-04

−0.56, −0.11

0.90

0

9

2/3.1

NP

Uman LS, 2013

Hypnosis

Control

Needle-related (children, adolescents), self-reported

176

0.09 (−0.57, 0.74)

−1.4 (−2.32, −0.47)

0.003

−4.81, 2.01

0.41

85

5

4/0.37

<0.001

Williams AC, 2012

Cognitive behavioural

TAU

Chronic (excl. HA), post-treatment

1148

−0.53 (−0.87, −0.19)

−0.21 (−0.37, −0.05)

0.010

−0.72, 0.29

0.02

45

16

4/15.61

NP

  1. Abbreviations: AC Active control, AtC Attention control, ASMP Arthritis Self-Management Program, BFB Biofeedback, CBT Cognitive behavioural therapy, EDU Education, EMG BFB Electromyographic biofeedback, HA Headache, HYP Hypnotherapy, IM Imagination, IT Intermediate term, LT Long term, m Months, MBT Mindfulness-based therapy, MBCT Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, MBPSR Multidisciplinary bio-psychosocial rehabilitation programs, MTMD Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorder, MBR Multidisciplinary biopsychological rehabilitation, NA Not applicable, because only two studies were available, NP Not pertinent, because the expected number of statistically significant studies is larger than the observed, NR Not reported, REL Relaxation, RIMH Relaxation, guided imagery, meditation or hypnosis, SGT Supportive group therapy, SMP Self-management education programmes, ST Short term, St. Care Standard care, TAU Treated as usual, UC Usual Care, WL Waiting list
  2. aAll summary point estimates on this table were indicative of pain reduction comparing the intervention to the control group. However, the original meta-analyses reported both positive and negative effects as observed on this table because they used different outcome metrics (e.g., pain reduction or difference in pain levels)
  3. bOn these comparisons MD is reported, instead of SMD
  4. cSummary effect and 95% confidence interval of largest study (smallest standard error) in each meta-analysis
  5. dRandom effects refer to summary effect (95% CI) using the random-effects model
  6. e P value of summary random effects estimate
  7. f P-value from the Egger’s regression asymmetry test
  8. gExpected number of statistically significant studies using the point estimate of the largest study (smallest standard error) as the plausible effect size
  9. hObserved/Expected number of statistically significant studies
  10. i P value of the excess statistical significance test. All statistical tests were two-sided