Illness beliefs among patients with chronic widespread pain - associations with self-reported health status, anxiety and depressive symptoms and impact of pain
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 February 2017
Accepted: 20 June 2017
Published: 5 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Edmond|
|17 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pirjo Järemo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Edmond|
|19 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pirjo Järemo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s40359-017-0192-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.