Skip to main content

Table 4 Results from models with significant interaction effects between affective disorders and personality or work circumstances a

From: The impact of conscientiousness, mastery, and work circumstances on subsequent absenteeism in employees with and without affective disorders

 

Odds Ratio

p-value

95% C.I.

Interaction model 1. Affective disorders  x conscientiousness

 Main effect depressive disorder

2.35

<.001

1.50–3.69

 Main effect anxiety disorder

1.13

.63

.70–1.82

 Main effect comorbid disorder

1.65

.04

1.02–2.65

 Main effect conscientiousness

0.75

.045

.56–.99

 Depressive disorder x conscientiousness

1.58

.06

.99–2.51

 Anxiety disorder x conscientiousness

2.05

.003

1.27–3.31

 Comorbid disorder x conscientiousness

1.61

.03

1.06–2.47

Interaction model 2. Affective disorders x job demands

 Main effect depressive disorder

2.47

<.001

1.55–3.93

 Main effect anxiety disorder

1.32

.24

.83–2.11

 Main effect comorbid disorder

1.74

.03

1.07–2.84

 Main effect job demands

0.82

.13

.63–1.06

 Depressive disorder x job demands

1.67

.03

1.07–2.62

 Anxiety disorder x job demands

1.42

.13

.91–2.21

 Comorbid disorder x job demands

1.33

.15

.90–1.96

  1. a Variables not shown in the table are: gender, education, age, chronic diseases, previous absenteeism, conscientiousness (only model 2), job demands (only model 1), mastery, job support, job control. All independent variables except dichotomous ones are standardized