This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The impact of conscientiousness, mastery, and work circumstances on subsequent absenteeism in employees with and without affective disorders
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 1 August 2016
Accepted: 20 March 2017
Published: 29 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Fekke Ybema|
|9 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Almar Kok|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Fekke Ybema|
|19 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Almar Kok|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Fekke Ybema|
|17 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Almar Kok|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s40359-017-0179-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.