Skip to main content

Table 9 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on precision in participant 4

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

  D Means t P
Session 1
 2D vs. Direct 387.8 5.58 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 223.2 3.21 0.001
 Fisheye vs. Direct 164.5 2.37 0.018
Session 2
 2D vs. Direct 365.6 8.49 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 105.8 1.53 0.126 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 334.2 0.52 0.000
Session 3
 2D vs. Direct 653.2 9.45 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 205.3 2.97 0.003
 Fisheye vs. Direct 448.4 6.48 0.000
Session 4
 2D vs. Direct 393.8 5.69 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 12.57 0.18 0.856 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 406.3 5.87 0.000
Session 5
 2D vs. Direct 460.3 6.56 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 48.5 0.69 0.486 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 412.1 5.96 0.000
Session 6
 2D vs. Direct 539.9 6.353 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 100.4 5.627 0.146 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 355.8 5.14 0.000
Session 7
 2D vs. Direct 458.9 6.64 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 214.8 3.11 0.002
 Fisheye vs. Direct 244.4 3.53 0.000
Session 8
 2D vs. Direct 281.1 4.06 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 45.9 0.66 0.507 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 326.9 4.73 0.000
  1. Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on precision of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V 3 ) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S 8 ) in level 4 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison