Table 9 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on precision in participant 4
| Â | D Means | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|
Session 1 | |||
 2D vs. Direct | 387.8 | 5.58 | 0.000 |
 2D vs. Fisheye | 223.2 | 3.21 | 0.001 |
 Fisheye vs. Direct | 164.5 | 2.37 | 0.018 |
Session 2 | |||
 2D vs. Direct | 365.6 | 8.49 | 0.000 |
 2D vs. Fisheye | 105.8 | 1.53 | 0.126 NS |
 Fisheye vs. Direct | 334.2 | 0.52 | 0.000 |
Session 3 | |||
 2D vs. Direct | 653.2 | 9.45 | 0.000 |
 2D vs. Fisheye | 205.3 | 2.97 | 0.003 |
 Fisheye vs. Direct | 448.4 | 6.48 | 0.000 |
Session 4 | |||
 2D vs. Direct | 393.8 | 5.69 | 0.000 |
 2D vs. Fisheye | 12.57 | 0.18 | 0.856 NS |
 Fisheye vs. Direct | 406.3 | 5.87 | 0.000 |
Session 5 | |||
 2D vs. Direct | 460.3 | 6.56 | 0.000 |
 2D vs. Fisheye | 48.5 | 0.69 | 0.486 NS |
 Fisheye vs. Direct | 412.1 | 5.96 | 0.000 |
Session 6 | |||
 2D vs. Direct | 539.9 | 6.353 | 0.000 |
 2D vs. Fisheye | 100.4 | 5.627 | 0.146 NS |
 Fisheye vs. Direct | 355.8 | 5.14 | 0.000 |
Session 7 | |||
 2D vs. Direct | 458.9 | 6.64 | 0.000 |
 2D vs. Fisheye | 214.8 | 3.11 | 0.002 |
 Fisheye vs. Direct | 244.4 | 3.53 | 0.000 |
Session 8 | |||
 2D vs. Direct | 281.1 | 4.06 | 0.000 |
 2D vs. Fisheye | 45.9 | 0.66 | 0.507 NS |
 Fisheye vs. Direct | 326.9 | 4.73 | 0.000 |