Skip to main content

Table 8 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on time in participant 4

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

  D Means t P
Session 1
 2D vs. Direct 2.425 10.05 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 0.957 3.96 0.000
 Fisheye vs. Direct 3.381 14.02 0.000
Session 2
 2D vs. Direct 2.202 9.13 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 0.217 0.90 0.368 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 2.420 10.03 0.000
Session 3
 2D vs. Direct 1.673 6.93 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 0.359 1.48 0.137 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 2.031 8.42 0.000
Session 4
 2D vs. Direct 1.772 7.34 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 0.177 0.73 0.464 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 1.595 6.61 0.000
Session 5
 2D vs. Direct 1.263 5.23 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 0.344 1.43 0.154 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 1.607 6.66 0.000
Session 6
 2D vs. Direct 1.686 6.99 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 0.243 1.01 0.314 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 1.929 7.99 0.000
Session 7
 2D vs. Direct 1.839 7.62 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 0.381 1.58 0.114 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 2.220 9.20 0.000
Session 8
 2D vs. Direct 1.740 7.21 0.000
 2D vs. Fisheye 0.068 0.28 0.778 NS
 Fisheye vs. Direct 1.808 7.49 0.000
  1. Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on time of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V 3 ) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S 8 ) in level 4 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison