Skip to main content

Table 7 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on precision in participant 3

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

 

D Means

t

P

Session 1

 2D vs. Direct

66.5

0.96

0.334 NS

 2D vs. Fisheye

227.7

3.57

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

354.8

5.11

0.000

Session 2

 2D vs. Direct

209.5

3.49

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

412.2

6.02

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

109.2

2.01

0.030

Session 3

 2D vs. Direct

269.4

2.53

0.020

 2D vs. Fisheye

267.7

2.21

0.020

 Fisheye vs. Direct

1.6

0.01

0.985 NS

Session 4

 2D vs. Direct

469.3

6.76

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

466.4

5.48

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

241.9

3.49

0.000

Session 5

 2D vs. Direct

522.1

7.52

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

70.2

1.09

0.300 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

420.9

6.48

0.000

Session 6

 2D vs. Direct

861.8

10.42

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

319.1

2.99

0.010

 Fisheye vs. Direct

257.2

2.85

0.015

Session 7

 2D vs. Direct

387.3

6.57

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

393.9

6.23

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

60.6

0.07

0.938 NS

Session 8

 2D vs. Direct

644.7

9.29

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

90.7

6.51

0.284 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

553.7

1.07

0.000

  1. Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on precision of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V 3 ) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S 8 ) in level 3 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us