Skip to main content

Table 5 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on precision in participant 2

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

 

D Means

t

P

Session 1

 2D vs. Direct

764.1

11.01

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

435.7

6.28

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

328.3

4.73

0.000

Session 2

 2D vs. Direct

787.2

9.26

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

524.0

7.55

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

263.2

3.09

0.000

Session 3

 2D vs. Direct

432.5

5.09

0.004

 2D vs. Fisheye

199.2

2.88

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

622.8

8.96

0.000

Session 4

 2D vs. Direct

768.7

11.81

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

26.8

0.38

0.698 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

741.2

10.71

0.000

Session 5

 2D vs. Direct

741.3

11.02

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

198.1

2.88

0.004

 Fisheye vs. Direct

563.2

8.35

0.010

Session 6

 2D vs. Direct

535.2

6.29

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

31.1

0.45

0.653 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

588.0

5.59

0.000

Session 7

 2D vs. Direct

558.3

6.57

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

110.4

1.59

0.111 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

442.2

6.39

0.000

Session 8

 2D vs. Direct

890.3

12.10

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

262.3

3.07

0.002

 Fisheye vs. Direct

528.0

8.34

0.007

  1. Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on precision of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V 3 ) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S 8 ) in level 2 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison