Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

Table 1 5-Way ANOVA summary

Factor	Factor Level	M	SEM	ANOVA on time	M	SEM	ANOVA on precision
Viewing	Direct	5.34	0.05	F(2,3839) = 9953.73p < .001	636	9	F(2,3839) = 509.26p < .001
	Fisheye	8.65	0.08		886	12
	2D	8.42	0.08		995	13
Manipulation	Tool	8.16	0.08	F(1,3839) = 4176.32p < .001	841	9	F(1,3839) = 0.28; NS
Manipulation	No Tool	6.78	0.06	F(1,3839) = 4176.32p < .001	836	11	F(1,3839) = 0.28; NS
Touch	Glove	7.47	0.07	F (1, 3839) = 0.05 NS	850	20	F(2,3839) = 5.86; p < .02
Touch	No Glove	7.47	0.07	F (1, 3839) = 0.05 NS	827	10	F(2,3839) = 5.86; p < .02
Session	Session 1	9.52	0.18	F(7,3839) = 1452.22p < .001	900	23	F(2,3839) = 56.79; p < .001
	…	…	…		…	…
	Session 8	6.62	0.1		745	19
Participant	1	10.17	0.07	F(3,3839) = 9986.77p < .001	503	9	F(2,3839) = 653.91p < .001
	2	8.17	0.05		1065	14
	3	6.03	0.04		938	11
	4	5.53	0.03		950	11

Summary of main results of the 5-Way ANOVA. Means (M) for the dependent variables ‘time’ (left) and ‘precision’ (right) and their standard errors (SEM) are given for the different levels of each principal variable (factor). The F values, with degrees of freedom and probabilities limits, for the effect of each factor on each dependent variable are shown

ISSN: 2050-7283