Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of two psycho-educational family group interventions for improving psycho-social outcomes in persons with spinal cord injury and their caregivers: a randomized-controlled trial of multi-family group intervention versus an active education control condition

  • Dennis G. Dyck1Email author,
  • Douglas L. Weeks2, 3,
  • Sarah Gross2,
  • Crystal Lederhos Smith4,
  • Hilary A. Lott2,
  • Aimee J. Wallace2 and
  • Sonya M. Wood2
BMC PsychologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20164:40

Received: 27 June 2016

Accepted: 14 July 2016

Published: 26 July 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
27 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jul 2016 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2016 Article published 10.1186/s40359-016-0145-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Psychology, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, USA
St. Luke’s Rehabilitation Institute, Spokane, USA
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, USA
College of Nursing, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, USA