Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Friendship networks and psychological well-being from late adolescence to young adulthood: a gender-specific structural equation modeling approach

BMC PsychologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20164:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0143-2

Received: 25 September 2015

Accepted: 7 June 2016

Published: 11 July 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Fiori
29 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Starr
2 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Miething
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Fiori
22 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Miething
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Fiori
19 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Miething
Resubmission - Version 4
19 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Fiori
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
7 Jun 2016 Editorially accepted
11 Jul 2016 Article published 10.1186/s40359-016-0143-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Sociology, Stockholm University
(2)
Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet
(3)
Department of Sociology, Lund University

Advertisement