Skip to main content

Table 1 Setting, Design, Sample Size and Results of the Experiments in the Small-Scale Meta Analyses

From: The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments

Experiment Setting Design Total n M testing mediator (SD) M restudy mediator (SD) M testing related (SD) M restudy related (SD)
Coppens et al. Exp1 No-Mc Online 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects 87 0.26 (0.26) 0.13 (0.24) 0.21 (0.21) 0.16 (0.17)
Coppens et al. Exp1 Strong Mc Online 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects 94 0.50 (0.46) 0.40 (0.38) 0.38 (0.23) 0.14 (0.13)
Coppens et al. Exp2 Online 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects 141 0.36 (0.31) 0.24 (0.25) 0.50 (0.27) 0.37 (0.26)
Coppens et al. Exp3 Online 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects 95 0.57 (0.33) 0.29 (0.27) 0.31 (0.21) 0.32 (0.24)
Carpenter 2011 Exp2 Lab 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects 40 0.58 (0.23) 0.23 (0.12) 0.29 (0.18) 0.18 (0.16)
Rawson et al. Appendix B long lag Lab 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) mixed with retrieval cue within subjects 65 0.28 (0.25) 0.15 (0.19) 0.18 (0.17) 0.11 (0.15)
Rawson et al. Appendix B short lag Lab 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) mixed with retrieval cue within subjects 63 0.28 (0.26) 0.12 (0.18) 0.15 (0.18) 0.09 (0.12)
Brennan, Cho & Neely Set A Lab Mediator cue only, learning (restudy vs. testing) manipulated between subjects 68 0.27 (0.20) 0.19 (0.16)   
Brennan, Cho & Neely Set B Lab Mediator cue only, learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects 68 0.14 (0.12) 0.06 (0.08)   
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us