Experiment | Setting | Design | Total n | M testing mediator (SD) | M restudy mediator (SD) | M testing related (SD) | M restudy related (SD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coppens et al. Exp1 No-Mc | Online | 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects | 87 | 0.26 (0.26) | 0.13 (0.24) | 0.21 (0.21) | 0.16 (0.17) |
Coppens et al. Exp1 Strong Mc | Online | 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects | 94 | 0.50 (0.46) | 0.40 (0.38) | 0.38 (0.23) | 0.14 (0.13) |
Coppens et al. Exp2 | Online | 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects | 141 | 0.36 (0.31) | 0.24 (0.25) | 0.50 (0.27) | 0.37 (0.26) |
Coppens et al. Exp3 | Online | 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects | 95 | 0.57 (0.33) | 0.29 (0.27) | 0.31 (0.21) | 0.32 (0.24) |
Carpenter 2011 Exp2 | Lab | 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects | 40 | 0.58 (0.23) | 0.23 (0.12) | 0.29 (0.18) | 0.18 (0.16) |
Rawson et al. Appendix B long lag | Lab | 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) mixed with retrieval cue within subjects | 65 | 0.28 (0.25) | 0.15 (0.19) | 0.18 (0.17) | 0.11 (0.15) |
Rawson et al. Appendix B short lag | Lab | 2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) mixed with retrieval cue within subjects | 63 | 0.28 (0.26) | 0.12 (0.18) | 0.15 (0.18) | 0.09 (0.12) |
Brennan, Cho & Neely Set A | Lab | Mediator cue only, learning (restudy vs. testing) manipulated between subjects | 68 | 0.27 (0.20) | 0.19 (0.16) | ||
Brennan, Cho & Neely Set B | Lab | Mediator cue only, learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects | 68 | 0.14 (0.12) | 0.06 (0.08) |