|
Coppens et al. Exp1 No-Mc
|
Online
|
2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects
|
87
|
0.26 (0.26)
|
0.13 (0.24)
|
0.21 (0.21)
|
0.16 (0.17)
|
|
Coppens et al. Exp1 Strong Mc
|
Online
|
2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects
|
94
|
0.50 (0.46)
|
0.40 (0.38)
|
0.38 (0.23)
|
0.14 (0.13)
|
|
Coppens et al. Exp2
|
Online
|
2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects
|
141
|
0.36 (0.31)
|
0.24 (0.25)
|
0.50 (0.27)
|
0.37 (0.26)
|
|
Coppens et al. Exp3
|
Online
|
2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects
|
95
|
0.57 (0.33)
|
0.29 (0.27)
|
0.31 (0.21)
|
0.32 (0.24)
|
|
Carpenter 2011 Exp2
|
Lab
|
2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects
|
40
|
0.58 (0.23)
|
0.23 (0.12)
|
0.29 (0.18)
|
0.18 (0.16)
|
|
Rawson et al. Appendix B long lag
|
Lab
|
2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) mixed with retrieval cue within subjects
|
65
|
0.28 (0.25)
|
0.15 (0.19)
|
0.18 (0.17)
|
0.11 (0.15)
|
|
Rawson et al. Appendix B short lag
|
Lab
|
2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) mixed with retrieval cue within subjects
|
63
|
0.28 (0.26)
|
0.12 (0.18)
|
0.15 (0.18)
|
0.09 (0.12)
|
|
Brennan, Cho & Neely Set A
|
Lab
|
Mediator cue only, learning (restudy vs. testing) manipulated between subjects
|
68
|
0.27 (0.20)
|
0.19 (0.16)
| | |
|
Brennan, Cho & Neely Set B
|
Lab
|
Mediator cue only, learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects
|
68
|
0.14 (0.12)
|
0.06 (0.08)
| | |
