This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A protocol for a randomised active-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of an online mindfulness intervention on executive control, critical thinking and key thinking dispositions in a university student sample
© Noone and Hogan. 2016
Received: 17 December 2015
Accepted: 1 April 2016
Published: 12 April 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Noone|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexander Sumich|
|9 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Noone|
|18 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kari Eddington|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Noone|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Apr 2016||Editorially accepted|
|12 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s40359-016-0122-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.