|
Predicting SDQ Emotional Symptoms at T2 from Direct and Indirect Victimization at T1
|
|
Step 1
| |
.39
| | | |
281.5***
|
|
Gender
| | |
−0.94
|
0.12
|
−.22***
| |
|
T1 Emotional Symptoms
| | |
0.53
|
0.03
|
.52***
| |
|
Step 2
| |
.02
| | | |
11.2***
|
|
Gender
| | |
−0.90
|
0.12
|
−.21***
| |
|
T1 Emotional Symptoms
| | |
0.48
|
0.03
|
.47***
| |
|
T1 Victim of Direct Aggression
| | |
−0.38
|
0.58
|
−.03
| |
|
T1 Victim of Indirect Aggression
| | |
1.90
|
0.48
|
.15***
| |
|
Predicting SDQ Conduct Problems at T2 from Direct and Indirect Victimization at T1
|
|
Step 1
| |
.25
| | | |
150.6***
|
|
Gender
| | |
0.20
|
0.10
|
.06
| |
|
T1 Conduct Problems
| | |
0.52
|
0.03
|
.50***
| |
|
Step 2
| |
.01
| | | |
6.2**
|
|
Gender
| | |
0.15
|
0.16
|
.04
| |
|
T1 Conduct Problems
| | |
0.48
|
0.03
|
.46***
| |
|
T1 Victim of Direct Aggression
| | |
0.28
|
0.51
|
.02
| |
|
T1 Victim of Indirect Aggression
| | |
0.94
|
0.43
|
.09*
| |