|
Predicting Direct Aggression at T2 from SDQ subscales at T1
|
|
Step 1
| |
.30
| | | |
188.4***
|
|
Gender
| | |
0.02
|
0.01
|
.09**
| |
|
Direct Aggression
| | |
0.60
|
0.03
|
.52***
| |
|
Step 2
| |
.02
| | | |
14.0***
|
|
Gender
| | |
0.02
|
0.01
|
.08*
| |
|
T1 Direct Aggression
| | |
0.51
|
0.04
|
.44***
| |
|
T1 Emotional Symptoms
| | |
−0.00
|
0.00
|
−.04
| |
|
T1 Conduct Problems
| | |
0.01
|
0.01
|
.17***
| |
|
Predicting Indirect Aggression at T2 from SDQ subscales at T1
|
|
Step 1
| |
.31
| | | |
195.3***
|
|
Gender
| | |
−0.01
|
0.01
|
−.05
| |
|
Indirect Aggression
| | |
0.65
|
0.03
|
.55***
| |
|
Step 2
| |
.01
| | | |
6.2**
|
|
Gender
| | |
−0.02
|
0.01
|
−.06*
| |
|
T1 Indirect Aggression
| | |
0.58
|
0.03
|
.51***
| |
|
T1 Emotional Symptoms
| | |
−0.00
|
0.00
|
−.01
| |
|
T1 Conduct Problems
| | |
0.01
|
0.00
|
.11***
| |
|
Predicting Direct Victimization at T2 from SDQ subscales at T1
|
|
Step 1
| |
.29
| | | |
179.7***
|
|
Gender
| | |
0.01
|
0.01
|
.02
| |
|
Victim of Direct Aggression
| | |
0.56
|
0.03
|
.54***
| |
|
Step 2
| |
.02
| | | |
6.7***
|
|
Gender
| | |
0.01
|
0.01
|
.04
| |
|
T1 Victim of Direct Aggression
| | |
0.50
|
0.03
|
.48***
| |
|
T1 Emotional Symptoms
| | |
0.01
|
0.00
|
.07*
| |
|
T1 Conduct Problems
| | |
0.01
|
0.00
|
.08**
| |
|
Predicting Indirect Victimization at T2 from SDQ subscales at T1
|
|
Step 1
| |
.36
| | | |
249.6***
|
|
Gender
| | |
−0.03
|
0.01
|
−.08**
| |
|
Victim of Indirect Aggression
| | |
0.61
|
0.03
|
.58***
| |
|
Step 2
| |
.02
| | | |
8.9***
|
|
Gender
| | |
−0.02
|
0.01
|
−.07*
| |
|
T1 Victim of Indirect Aggression
| | |
0.54
|
0.03
|
.52***
| |
|
T1 Emotional Symptoms
| | |
0.01
|
0.00
|
.08**
| |
|
T1 Conduct Problems
| | |
0.01
|
0.00
|
.08**
| |
