Skip to main content

Table 2 Unstandardized estimates b and standardized effects β in the mediation model

From: A mediation model of mindfulness and decentering: sequential psychological constructs or one and the same?

Type of effect

b a

SE b

z c

BC 95% CI [LO – HO]d

βe

Direct effects

     

AWJ→ASP

.922*

.153

6.034

[.619; 1.216]

.281*

AWJ→DP

1.110*

.167

6.657

[.780; 1.429]

.311*

AWJ→DEP

-2.101*

.259

-8.108

[-2.615; -1.595]

-.329*

DES→ASP

.835*

.151

5.532

[.545; 1.129]

.250*

DES→DP

.552*

.162

3.419

[.235; . 862]

.152*

DES→DEP

-.813*

.318

-2.559

[-1.486; -.246]

-.125*

AWA→ASP

.600*

.162

3.714

[.274; .915]

.159*

AWA→DP

.605*

.192

3.157

[.215; .968]

.148*

AWA→DEP

.082

.285

.288

[-.470; .650]

.011

OBS-IN→ASP

.300*

.131

2.291

[.042; .559]

.111*

OBS-IN→DP

.034

.155

.216

[-.277; .336]

.011

OBS-IN→DEP

.110

.233

.470

[-.332; .582]

.021

OBS-OUT→ASP

.143

.154

.927

[-.160; .445]

.045

OBS-OUT→DP

.093

.194

.479

[-.272; .480]

.027

OBS-OUT→DEP

-.135

.269

-.499

[-.654; .387]

-.022

ASP→DEP

-.386*

.107

-3.593

[-.594; -.179]

-.198*

DP→DEP

-.346*

.078

-4.451

[-.508; -.204]

-.194*

Specific indirect effects

     

AWJ→ASP→DEP

-.356*

.122

-2.908

[-.649; -.160]

-.056*

AWJ→DP→DEP

-.384*

.104

-3.708

[-.631; -.217]

-.060*

DES→ASP→DEP

-.322*

0.116

-2.782

[-.603; -.134]

-.050*

DES→DP→DEP

-.191*

.074

-2.580

[-.373; -.076]

-.029*

AWA→ASP→DEP

-.232*

.092

-2.526

[-.458; -.088]

-.032*

AWA→DP→DEP

-.210*

.082

-2.564

[-.402; -.079]

-.029*

OBS-IN→ ASP→DEP

-.116*

.061

-1.898

[-.271; -.022]

-.022*

OBS-IN→ DP→DEP

-.012

.055

-.211

[-.129; .095]

-.002

OBS-OUT→ ASP→DEP

-.055

.063

-.877

[-.201; .052]

-.009

OBS-OUT→ DP→DEP

-.032

.069

-.469

[-.180; .093]

-.005

Total indirect effects

     

AWJ→ASP, DP→DEP

-.740*

.178

-4.166

[-1.146; -.443]

-.116*

DES→ASP, DP→DEP

-.513*

.179

-3.457

[-.848; -.263]

-.079*

AWA→ASP, DP→DEP

-.441*

.130

-3.392

[-.756; -.232]

-.060*

OBS-IN→ASP, DP→DEP

-.127

.091

-1.398

[-.341; .027]

-.024

OBS-OUT→ASP, DP→DEP

-.087

.108

-.811

[-.318; .104]

-.014

Total effects

     

AWJ→ASP, DP→DEP; AWJ→DEP

-2.841*

.312

-9.112

[-3.447; -2.227]

-.445*

DES→ASP, DP→DEP; DES→DEP

-1.326*

.316

-4.202

[-1.958; -.729]

-.204*

AWA→ASP, DP→DEP; AWA→DEP

-.359

.308

-1.164

[-.970; .252]

-.060

OBS-IN→ASP, DP→DEP; OBS-IN→DEP

-.018

.244

-.073

[-.479; .483]

-.003

OBS-OUT→ ASP, DP→DEP; OBS-OUT→DEP

-.222

.283

-.785

[-.783; .322]

-.036

  1. Note. aUnstandardized coefficients; bStandard error; c z-value; dLower and upper bound of bias-corrected 95% confidence interval with 5,000 bootstrap samples; eStandardized coefficients; AWJ = Accepting without Judgment; ASP = Accepting Self-Perception; DP = Distanced Perspective; DEP: depressive symptoms; DES = Describing; AWA = Acting with Awareness; OBS-IN = Observing of internal phenomena; OBS-OUT = Observing of external phenomena. *p < .05.
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us