Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

After a pair of self-control-intensive tasks, sucrose swishing improves subsequent working memory performance

BMC Psychology20131:22

https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-1-22

Received: 6 March 2013

Accepted: 9 October 2013

Published: 30 October 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Duckworth
5 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Ritchie
13 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Dunn
17 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Evan Carter
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Ritchie
29 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Dunn
24 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Evan Carter
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Oct 2013 Editorially accepted
30 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/2050-7283-1-22

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota
(2)
Department of Psychology, University of Miami

Advertisement