Towards a better psychological satisfaction: developing a mixed multi-criteria evaluation system to urban ‘Not in my back yard’ facilities siting

Table 3 A list of evaluation criteria for weight assignments

Evaluation Criteria		Expert’s weight-assignment	The weight of the coefficient of variation	The combined weight ɑ = 0.5
Quality criteria	Public impact	0.18	0.0784	0.1292
	Industrial impact	0.1	0.0679	0.0839
	Landscape impact	0.02	0.0000	0.0100
	Public perception	0.15	0.1357	0.1429
Quantification criteria	Land size	0.08	0.0738	0.0769
	Atmospheric environmental impacts	0.12	0.0718	0.0959
	Noises	0.08	0.1357	0.1079
	Land costs	0.05	0.0718	0.0609
	Construction investment	0.03	0.1177	0.0739
	Infrastructure support	0.05	0.0763	0.0632
	Shipping costs	0.08	0.0729	0.0765
	Running costs	0.06	0.0979	0.0789

ISSN: 2050-7283