BMC Psychology

Table 4 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on time in participant 2

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

	D Means	t	P
Session 1
2D vs. Direct	3.709	15.37	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	2.667	11.06	0.000
Fisheye vs. Direct	6.376	26.43	0.000
Session 2
2D vs. Direct	4.887	20.26	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	1.423	5.89	0.000
Fisheye vs. Direct	3.464	14.36	0.000
Session 3
2D vs. Direct	3.249	13.47	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.330	1.37	0.171 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	3.579	14.84	0.000
Session 4
2D vs. Direct	3.632	15.06	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.923	3.82	0.000
Fisheye vs. Direct	2.710	11.23	0.000
Session 5
2D vs. Direct	2.639	10.94	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.706	2.93	0.000
Fisheye vs. Direct	3.345	13.87	0.000
Session 6
2D vs. Direct	2.512	10.41	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.278	1.15	0.250 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	2.234	9.26	0.000
Session 7
2D vs. Direct	4.112	17.05	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.249	1.03	0.302 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	4.361	18.08	0.000
Session 8
2D vs. Direct	4.069	16.87	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.072	0.29	0.765 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	3.997	16.57	0.000

Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on time of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V₃) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S₈) in level 2 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison

Back to article page

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com