Promoting psychosocial wellbeing following stroke using narratives and guided self-determination: a feasibility study
© Kirkevold et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 8 July 2013
Accepted: 14 January 2014
Published: 3 February 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Marit Kirkevold|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Louisa-Jane Burton|
|15 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colin Bosma|
|10 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Marit Kirkevold|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|3 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/2050-7283-2-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.