After a pair of self-control-intensive tasks, sucrose swishing improves subsequent working memory performance
© Carter and McCullough; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 March 2013
Accepted: 9 October 2013
Published: 30 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Duckworth|
|5 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart Ritchie|
|13 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Dunn|
|17 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Evan Carter|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart Ritchie|
|29 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Dunn|
|24 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Evan Carter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|30 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/2050-7283-1-22|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.